Baxter’s arguments, proving that he was not liable to the penalty of the act of 17 Car. II for restraining Nonconformists from inhabiting corporations. ‘That Ri: Baxter is not lyable to the penalty of the Act of 17 Car. proved. 1˚ The Title is expository of the End & Sense of the Act which is [for restraining Nonconformists from inhabiting in Corporation’
Baxter’s case: he was not liable for restraining Nonconformists from living in corporations
Archive Unit
- For more information, email the repository
- Advice on accessing these materials
- Cite this description
- Bookmark:http://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb123-dwl/rb/dwl/rb/1/216
- This material is held at
- ReferenceGB 123 DWL/RB/1/216
- Former ReferenceGB 123 Treatises v.41 Treatises v.171
- Dates of Creation1665
- Name of Creator
- Physical Descriptionf 210; 300 x 190 mm.
Scope and Content
Note
Papers read at the Oxford Oath. See also DWL/RB/1/174; 176; 178; 226; 275.
Other Finding Aids
Argent / Black v.171 (also listed as v.41); Thomas p.12