Dr. Eeles's papers reflect the nature and extent of his interests and influence. He transcribed liturgical texts; collected books and manuscripts; studied church buildings and ornaments; compared liturgical practice in different places and periods; and was an authorised Lay Reader. He was Secretary of the Alcuin Club from 1903-1910 and a member of its Council for many years; Secretary of the Henry Bradshaw Society from 1928-1934; and a founder of the Warham Guild. He wrote extensively on liturgical and ecclesiological subjects; on Scottish church history; on Bells; on Coronations; on Episcopal Ceremonial; on Prayer Book Revision; on the Reservation of the Sacraments; and much more. Above all, he became a powerful exponent of the 'English Use', based on tradition and authority, against both the 'Romanisers' and the Evangelicals.
His papers have come to CERC principally because of his Secretaryship of the Central Council for the Care of Churches (CCCC)- a body responsible to the General Synod. The present collection, however, includes some material that was clearly not written in Eeles's capacity as Secretary; and some that is difficult to ascribe to any particular 'capacity'. He was consulted on liturgical and ecclesiological questions, by both laymen and ecclesiastics (including bishops and archbishops). Sometimes they wrote to him as Secretary of the CCCC, as his replies make clear; sometimes as a man of known authority and scholarship; and sometimes no reply survives so that it is hard to tell in what capacity he was addressed. Similarly, his own writings range from works clearly written on behalf of the CCCC (for example, 'The Care of the Parish Church'), to others clearly not so written (for example, on behalf of some partisan group, and sermons written in his capacity as an authorised Lay Reader). In between is a body of liturgical or historical writing which cannot easily be classified as 'official' or 'private'. It is this difficulty of dividing the papers into 'official' or 'private' which has guided the decision to retain the collection intact.
It would, moreover, have been difficult to split up the collection without doing violence to the integrated nature of Eeles's work and thought. His historical scholarship was the foundation on which his liturgical advice was based. His studies of church architecture and ecclesiological history; his knowledge of vestments and hangings (enriched by his years at the Victoria and Albert Museum); and his widespread correspondence with ecclesiastics in all parts of Britain and throughout the world, about their practice and ceremonial; all contributed to his work as Secretary. To remove any of these groups of papers would have impaired the collection.