Google in the dog house?


An article in saturday’s Times (26/05/07) warns us about the Big Brother nature of Google:

http://tinyurl.com/ynuovl

David Rowan warns that Google holds a great deal of personal information about us, and yet this is only the beginning of its campaign to monitor our likes, dislikes and motivations. As soon as you sign up for any Google service, the data accumilation process begins. As Rowan suggested, I logged onto iGoogle (personalised Google web page) and looked at my web surfing history, which includes searches, sites and clicks. Curiously, top of the ‘movers’ which is described as ‘recent top queries related to your searches’ was ‘Crufts’. Seeing as my searches included conference venues, educational institutions and The National Archives, I found this a little surprising.

When Google started we all thought it was rather quirky and friendly and took us away from the global dominance attitude of Microsoft. Now it is becoming increasingly dominant in a way that may be rather more unhealthy. You may be happy for Google to build up a psychological profile of you, in order to make useful suggestions about what you might want to buy, to wear, to do, to think…Its not as if this approach isn’t something many of us take advantage of – I have bought items from Amazon following suggestions of ‘if you like that you might like this’. But it does seem to be important for us to be aware that this is happening and think about how confident we are that Google will guarantee to keep our information private.

It is also interesting to think about the nature of this personal data from the point of view of archiving. Google may be looking to ‘organise the world’s information’ rather than store it, but in the end it is still eagerly gathering personal information. How is this information held and what will happen to it in the future?

About Jane Stevenson

Archives Hub Service Manager.
This entry was posted in archives hub. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Google in the dog house?

  1. Jeanne says:

    Jane –
    I posted some ideas on related topics back when Google announced their new log retention policy in Google, Privacy, Records Managment and Archives. I think it might be of interest to you.
    - Jeanne

  2. Anonymous says:

    Thanks for the post it is really interesting!
    And the dog is so cute! I have a lab too!

    Laura

  3. Jane says:

    Jeanne, the blog entry you point to is really interesting – i didn’t realise that Google were planning to strip parts of IP addresses from log records. Like you, I instantly thought of the advantages of being able to close records for 100 years, rather than, to protect privacy of individuals, deleting information that we can never resurrect. But the majority of people will not think about historic value, only present concerns.

  4. Payday UK says:

    The payday loans uk cycle can become disparaging. When the time came to pay it back
    right away and can often lead borrowers into a never ending cycle off borowing
    more each month to cover the loan again. Lucent
    was accused in a PAC report of lacking basic information on
    the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act will protect you from
    running into problems with your bank.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


− four = 4

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>